Tuesday, August 23, 2016

Maine "Refugees" Who Died Fighting For ISIS

Two Muslim immigrants who lived in Maine were killed fighting for ISIS and each left a wife and children here on welfare. The second, Adnan Fazeli, was revealed last week by the Portland Press Herald, but how many people realize there was at least one other? And, are there any more? If so, that information would be kept under wraps as long as possible.
The first was Abdirahmaan Muhumed, aka Abdifatah Ahmed, about whom I wrote in January, 2015. He was born in Somalia, raised in Minnesota, lived in Lewiston, and became a US citizen in South Portland, Maine. His Maine wife divorced him because he wanted multiple wives. He was killed in Syria in 2014 and it’s worth mentioning that he also worked at the Minneapolis/St. Paul airport. Think about that next time you board a plane.

Last week’s Press Herald headline on Fazeli read: “Documents: Freeport man died fighting for Islamic State in Lebanon.” Was he a “Freeport man”? By whose definition? He was an Iranian who professed, at one time at least, a desire to become American. To be a “Freeport man” one must be an American. Nowhere in the article does it say Fazeli was a citizen. It said he became radicalized in Maine by watching ISIS videos and converting to Wahhabism, which the PPH called an “austere” version of Islam. That’s like calling the KKK an austere version of Christianity. Wahhabism is radical Islam. It’s jihadism calling for the destruction of the west. Maine State Police Detective George Loder said: “Fazeli’s change in behavior alienated him from many of his Shia and moderate Sunni friends in the area. However, there were a few local Sunnis who supported his [radical Islamist] fervor and treated him with a great deal of respect.”
The article said Fazeli was a “refugee” brought to Portland by Catholic Charities in 2009. He was born in Iran and raised a Shia Muslim, but “self-identified” as Arab and not “Iranian.” What a suspicious phrase that is. Was he born Persian, which is a different, majority-ethnic group in Iran? Faze also identified as a Sunni Muslim, a branch of Islam which comprises about 9% of Iran’s population, but he was afraid of being arrested so he “fled” to Syria, a puppet state of Iran where a civil war was raging between Sunnis and Shiites. How does that make sense? Syria would be the last place to go for “refuge.” Was he perhaps interested in joining Sunni terrorists like ISIS and al Qaida which were fighting the Shia in Syria? 
Yasidi females -- former ISIS sex slaves

Then he “fled” Syria, arriving as a “refugee” in Philadelphia in 2009, and “came to the Portland area through Catholic Charities Refugee and Immigration Services,” according to the Press Herald. The article goes on to say: “Catholic Charities in Portland said Fazeli tried to receive social services [welfare] from the organization but was told that because he had come to Maine from another U.S. city after he’d immigrated to the U.S., he was not eligible…”
However, Fazeli did go on welfare along with his wife and three kids. This was reluctantly revealed in subsequent Press Herald article headlined: “LePage orders scrutiny of welfare benefits for immigrants in Maine… a reaction to the case of an Iranian refugee who... was killed fighting for the Islamic State in Lebanon in 2015.”
Interesting that he wasn’t a “Freeport man” anymore, but “an Iranian refugee.” Most illegal aliens sneaking into the country now ask for “asylum” as instructed by immigration lawyers — virtually all of whom are Democrats. Most "refugees" are not fleeing war-torn countries either. They come from the Middle East, Africa, Central America, and other places as economic migrants to get what Fazeli was getting. Only some are leaving Syria or Somalia, but media like the Portland Press Herald and the Sun Journal of Lewiston imply that all are genuine refugees from war-torn countries. The London Daily Mail reports that four out of five migrants to the EU in 2015, for example, were economic migrants looking for a better life, not refugees fleeing a war zone.
Soros and Hillary

This “refugee” migration is pushed by the Democrat Party as a recruitment drive. That’s why George Soros funds it so lavishly both here and in Europe according to recently-hacked documents from Soros’s “Open Society Foundation.” It's a scam to "fundamentally transform" the United States and the entire western world while getting the rest of us to pay for it.
Obama and Soros

Soros also funds attacks against writers like David Horowitz, Pam Geller and Cliff May (all of whom I’ve met) and others who expose things like what I've written above. Stories like Fazeli's and Muhamed’s give ordinary voters a peek under the rug where liberal media desperately try to sweep stories about radical Islam in the USA — while depicting writers like me as hateful bigots for exposing them.


Brian said...

I wasn't sure what the whole point of the column was (human interest story?) until the very end when you seem to try and turn the whole deal into some liberal media plot. What exactly is this liberal media of which you speak? I read a column in the Boston Herald by Howie Carr which you would like (i.e. not liberal), along with columns in the Globe and the Washing Post stating the facts without taking sides. So who is this liberal media? And is this media "sweeping away" these stories, or just not blowing them up into hysteria? This is a peak into what rug? Everybody knows that people come into this country without going through the proper channels, and that some of them go on to do bad things. Although not nearly as many as doing beneficial things. This has been going on since the days of the pilgrims screwing over the Native Americans.

We are a land founded by immigrants (c'mon, you want to argue that what was done to the Native Americans was through the means of "legal" immigration?

Proudly emblazoned on the Statue of Liberty is “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” To me, immigration is simple. Let those striving for a free and better life keep coming as they have since our great country was founded (and now contributing nearly $12 billion each year to state and local tax coffers - despite Trumps lies....or stupidity )


...so let them come, and IF they commit a crime than deport them. But do some honest researching and you will find that it appears they do WAY more good than harm.

Ah, but they are "different"! Get 'em out of here! Terrorists and rapists! The sky is falling! Panic! Fear! Hey, Trump, how about working the scaredy cat vote...

Anonymous said...

The picture of the Klansman and the ISIS man had an interesting caption. The interesting part was the "claiming to be religious" part. So, you are saying that it is NOT the religion that is evil and causing problems, it is people just claiming to be Muslim. And yet so much emphasis you used to place on calling it Islamic terrorism.

That is a real step forward in thinking, Tom. Maybe you are evolving.

Anonymous said...

...And how about the picture trying to claim an ISIS man forced a 7 year old to marry him. No wonder Tom gets so tiled up about stuff, he is the most gullible sucker around. He will believe anything he wants to believe!


Gullible sucker or dishonorable liar? I can see the similarities between Tom and Trump.

Anonymous said...

Excellent read

Anonymous said...

I can't wait to see the "expert" rebuttal, from somewhere-out-of state, in the Daily Sun.

Anonymous said...

So you find a half dozen examples out of millions of people and say that they're all like that. It would take me 5 minutes to find a half a dozen examples of Christian extremist terrorists. Should we deport all Christians?

The key word is extremists. Religion doesn't matter. Country of origin doesn't matter. Many countries have had a problem with home grown terrorists in my lifetime. Off the top of my head I can think of Ireland, Spain, Japan, Sri Lanka, and the U.S. Should we limit people from any country whose had terrorists?

Tom McLaughlin said...

Ok. That picture of a child bride wasn't authentic and I will replace it. The widespread practice of Muslim men marrying children has been going on for fourteen hundred years beginning with Mohammed himself who married a 6-year-old and consummated the marriage when she was 9.

If you doubt that forced marriages in Muslim countries are ubiquitous and have been for centuries, I refer you to this MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute) piece with examples from just the last few years:

Anonymous said...

I'm not surprised that there is a history of Muslin men marrying children. Fundamentalist religion and abuse of women and children go hand in hand. It does not matter if the fundamentalist is Muslim, Christian or any other religion.

Fundamentalist religion is a major risk factor for child abuse, only exceeded by drug abuse. Whenever a prominent fundamentalist is arrested for assault or abuse just read the comment section. People come out of the wood works to defend him. I've read people seriously saying that a sexual assault by an adult man of a three year old must be the three year old's fault because she did something enticing. Many religious fundamentalists really do not understand the concept of abuse. The bible clearly and unambiguously says that men are in charge and can do anything they want to the wives and children. More moderate Christians, Muslims and other religions understand why this is wrong. But if you really believe that the Bible cannot be wrong it is very easy to believe that it is okay to marry children, or abuse or kill them because these behaviors are clearly approved of by God.

Anonymous said...

Let's cut to the chase, ISIS, al-Qaeda, the Taliban, Boko Haram, al-Shabaab, Hamas, Hezbollah and so on are the "good" Muslims because they are emulating the words and barbaric deeds of Mohammed, the ultimate authority for Islamic doctrine. He had 13 wives, numerous sex slaves, was a misogynist, a pedophile and a blood thirsty warrior prophet who kept 20% of the booty while personally participating in 27 of 65 battles during his last nine years of life (the Medinan period). His favorite sword was the "Zulfiqar". What was the name of Jesus's favorite sword?

Judaism and Christianity may have had its historical violent chapters but Islam has had a track record of 1,400 years of conquest and jihad with 270 million deaths. Google: "Tears of Jihad".

Elitists in the media and our government understand that there are "5 Pillars of Islam": Testimony of Faith, Praying 5 times/day, zakat, fasting at Ramadan and making the pilgrimage to Mecca which is where they get their sanitized mantra that, "Islam is a religion of peace".

As with all of the "great" religions, one does good deeds in an effort to get to heaven. I don't care about the religious aspects of Islam, only a Muslim does. I do care about the ideology of Islam which is no different than Nazism, communism or Fascism. They are all totalitarian, supremacist, political ideologies but Islam is cloaked in religious garb.

Few people are aware of the "5 Responsibilities of Islam": To assemble, to listen, to obey, to wage jihad (not just violent but stealth/cultural jihad), and to emigrate.

The current fake refugee crisis in Europe (soon to be here) is what's known as the "hijra". It's obligatory for Muslims to migrate to the land of the kaffir (unbeliever) to proselytize for Islam and establish Sharia law. Otherwise, why don't they flee to the oil rich nations? The answer is that these Islamic countries are complicit in promoting the hijra.

The UNHCR is pressured by the 56 nation OIC which in turn pressures our State Department to take in non-vetted Muslim refugees. Plus, it's big business for the 9 major VOLAGs with 350 subcontractors to seed these refugees into our communities. Blah, blah, we're a nation of immigrants. However, it makes no sense to take in unskilled, uneducated people who will not assimilate because of the Islamic principle of "tamkeen" (empowerment).

I'm not smart enough to come up with these statements on my own. Visit The Center for the Study of Political Islam -Dr. Bill Warner or read "Modern Day Trojan Horse" -Sam Soloman & E Al Maqdisi, "Refugee Resettlement and the Hijra to America", -Ann Corcoran or "The Red-Green Axis" -Jim Simpson. You should also visit the websites of Jihad Watch, The Clarion Project, Act for America, Atlas Shrugs or The Center for Security Policy among many others.

Unknown said...

Sadly a very liberal response.
It should sadden every tax paying American that immigration lawyers would coach these people to claim they came from a war torn part of the mid-east all so they get provided for when the honest people have no problem supporting themselves and their families. Those would be the ones looking for a hand up and the others looking for a hand out.
Any immigration lawyer coaching these people should be considered enemy's of the state. Also if chatholic charities can afford to bring these people here then they should have to support them until they can support themselves.
Trump is a jack ass but even that doesn't put any of the blame on him...
He merely was voted in by the people who quite frankly are sick of liberals like you that feel everyone should foot the bill of any and all including illegal immigrants..... key word being illegal.
Perhaps when making comparisons you Might liken yourself a martyr so when looking in the mirror you don't see how you and others like you are the problem!