Monday, September 16, 2019

New Maine Residents



It’s no big deal to see a wild turkey in Maine anymore. They’re as common as crows these days, but it hasn’t been that long, and I remember the first time I saw one around here. My wife was driving a little school bus in nearby Sweden, Maine when she saw one acting funny beside Knight’s Hill Road after dropping off her last student. Thinking it injured, she took it into the bus and brought it home. I’m not sure I could call it wild though, as it seemed unsure of itself — as if trying to decide whether it was wild or domesticated. That wasn’t too long after Maine had first reintroduced turkeys here in 1978. Now, of course, they’re prolific.

Bald Eagle and Osprey over Kezar Lake
Seeing a bald eagle is becoming routine too. The first time I ever saw one in Lovell, Maine, I saw two. Was it twelve years ago? Fifteen? I’m not sure, but I was doing the dishes at the kitchen sink and noticed two large birds circling each other very high up. I had to squint to notice the white tails, then the white heads. A few years later I saw one in a kind of aerial dogfight with a much smaller osprey over middle bay on Kezar Lake in Lovell. More recently I saw one perched on a branch beside the lake trying to eat a fish as it was being harassed by smaller birds. He flew off clutching the half-eaten fish while being dive-bombed by those pesky little birds.

Harassed Bald Eagle over Kezar Lake
I still stop and stare when I see a bald eagle today because they’re just so majestic, and there aren’t that many of them around yet. About six weeks ago, I saw my first golden eagle soaring above the Spurwink River estuary at Higgins Beach in Scarborough, Maine. I had my 150-600 mm lens with me because I was planning to photograph arctic terns as they dove for small fish. They weren’t active that day and I was about to head back to my vehicle when this huge bird appeared over the water. Someone had told me that goldens are bigger than bald eagles and I figured that must be what I was looking at through my lens. It was huge.
Golden Eagle in Scarborough, Maine
The big bird flew in slow circles looking down to the surface of the estuary for his lunch. He evidently didn’t see anything catchable so he flew back to a perch on a limb on the other side of the river mouth. He was in shadow and I couldn’t get a decent shot of him over there so I waited for him to come back out and go fishing again hoping to get a shot of him diving down and grabbing one. Unfortunately, he never emerged before it was time for me to leave. As soon as I got home I downloaded the images and researched golden eagles to make sure of my identification. It was definitely a golden eagle.

Golden Eagle in Scarborough, Maine
So far I’ve only seen opossum as roadkill here in Maine and have yet to see a live one. It shouldn’t be long before I do though because the roadkill was less than a mile from my house. He wasn’t just “playing possum” as his entrails had burst out over the pavement. Guess I’ll have to study up on their habits so I can hopefully get some shots of a live one.


Last fall I saw a small flock of tannish, heron-like birds with red markings on their heads in the back of a large farm field in nearby North Fryeburg, Maine. I wasn’t sure what they were, but when I saw a notice on Facebook of Maine sightings of sandhill cranes this past summer, I realized what they were. Two weeks ago, I was looking for Indian artifacts along the course of the Old Saco River when I heard their distinct, high-pitched “kuk-err, kuk-err” emanating from a nearby field. I went back to my truck, attached the long lens to my camera, and drove over there.

Sandhill Cranes in Fryeburg
They must have heard me coming because all six or seven of them had turned their heads my way from across the field. I emerged, camera-ready, from my truck and walked slowly toward them. “Kuk-err, kuk-err,” I heard again as they got agitated. I kept walking in their direction until they took off, chattering as they cleared the treetops separating that field from the next. According to an article in the Boothbay Register, there have been nesting pairs of sandhill cranes in Maine since at least the year 2000.

Sandhill Cranes in Fryeburg
It’s big and bulky, but I’ll definitely be packing my long lens on future trips to North Fryeburg — or anywhere else in Maine for that matter. I got myself a larger backpack capable of carrying all I’ll need to photograph all the new residents of our state.

11 comments:

Jared James Bristol said...

Brian! Where the heck are ya? Wouldn't an article containing Bald Eagles warrent a comment about some nasty nationalism? Jared Bristol

Uber_Fritz said...

Tom

If this is your photography then I am impressed!

Tom McLaughlin said...

The eagles and the cranes are my photos. The turkey and the opossum are not.

CaptDMO said...

Turkeys? Rare?
I've seen up to 25 (assorted age) at a pop in the orchard. (NH)
Depends on the annual hatch of course, apparently, we now have coyotes.
As for "What the heck are birds like THAT doing around here?"
Keep an eye on the swamps surrounding Conway Lake.

Brian said...

How cute, Jared misses me!

So.....nice photos.

But that is not what Jared is looking for, so let me add the Audubon Society predicts that three quarters of the bald eagles’ current summer range will become unsuitable for the birds in 60 years.

Brooke Bateman, senior scientist at the National Audubon Society : “A lot of their breeding is going to shift completely into Canada and Alaska. So the lower 48 is looking less ideal for breeding conditions for the species.”

So as the climate changes, the national bird may find fewer places in the United States to call home.

Same goes for the turkeys. All because of the partisan, denialist turkeys.

Brian said...

And of course it is not just birds and animals being affected....how awesome to see the thousands and thousands of young people yesterday standing up for themselves and striking around the world to draw attention to global warming! They realize something has to be done to overcome the selfish old people who's personal lives will not be affected much as they won't be living in the world they are helping to destroy. Screw future generations and instead save a little bit of money short term on their energy bills, huh? Insanely selfish and short-sighted.

CaptDMO said...

How unfortunate for the Audubon Socioty that Brooke Bateman is in error.
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-09-18/bald-eagles-have-found-themselves-a-new-home-suburbia
Much like EVERY previous Man Made Global Climate alteration (among "others) "acorn on the head" in the past.
Mr. Mann STILL has yet to "share his work"!

Brian said...

How unfortunate that the simple-minded can get persuaded by one column from the mainstream media that does not even relate to the topic at hand - global warming. Yes, eagles have been pushed out of their natural habitat and into more thickly populated areas by the human effect on the environment......but just how does that dispute the Audubon's scientifically made claim that global warming is making their natural habitat (and ours) unsuitable?

But I guess it is "screw all those "scientists" with their "facts" and their "research" and "data"....and screw all the youths panicked by science and being so over-concerned with the health of the planet they are inheriting, and their living conditions. They should just chill out, and ignore the smell of smoke and the danger of their house burning down. Heck, fires start all the time, sometimes by no cause of humans...so why try and deal with the problem? Go back to sleep kids, it's just an acorn falling....

And I'm not quite sure what you mean about Mann and his "sharing his work"....many of his works are easily available. But why obsess on one man(n) anyway? There are thousands of of scientists whose SHARED work reflects the dangers of our effect on the climate. I don't get the reluctance to play it safe, and scientific, when it comes to our children's health and wellbeing. It's chilling.







Reality Check said...

https://people.com/politics/trump-administration-weakens-endangered-species-act-bald-eagle/

Steve said...

The reality is, future generations depend on us; we don’t depend on them. That gives us unwritten license to live or lives as recklessly and self-indulgently as we want, because we’ll never have to live through any consequence of that. Our children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, etc will, but we won’t.
So, let’s say the over whelming majority of scientists are wrong about manmade climate change, and Sean Hannity and Lou Dobbs are the ones who got it right. The current US population is about 350M and the global population is about 7.5B. What will life on earth look like when the US population reaches 7.5B and the global population reaches a multiple of that? The world contains finite resources that simply cannot support a limitless human population. We either deal with that after we’ve reached a point of critical mass when our sacrifices will be severe and costly, or we incrementally deal with it now when our sacrifices will be far more modest. But my worry is how partisan republicans frame every aspect of the environmental debate. For decades now, their approach to any notion that even remotely smacks of environmentalism is to ridicule it and ultimately dismiss it. Admittedly, some on the environmental left have come up with some crackpot notions, but those are the ones partisan conservatives take great pains to present to their audiences. I watched a Fox segment with my mother where they interviewed someone from Levis I think it was. As a way of saving water, he advocated not washing jeans but putting them in the freezer instead, which he claimed killed the germs that cause odors. Of course, the fair and balanced media had great fun at his expense. That’s the kind of environmentalist positions those on the partisan right continually parade in front of the audience to remind them how absurd the entire environmentalist movement always is. That’s the concerning part. If Republicans are constantly and only told how ridiculous environmentalism is, then they will never take seriously ANY environmental initiative. And if they never take it seriously, then it will always be their last consideration in every situation. The core of environmentalism is clean air, clean water and a healthy biodiversity. How have those become a partisan political issues?

CaptDMO said...

Partisan....Systematically progressive socialist luddites, or exceptiona; experts, with no history of "legal" issues.
Politically rogue, with lack of redacted "supporters".
"Latest studies show...."

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/09/toplevel_climate_modeler_goes_rogue_criticizes_nonsense_of_global_warming_crisis.html