Tom McLaughlin

A former history teacher, Tom is a columnist who lives in Lovell, Maine. His column is published in Maine and New Hampshire newspapers and on numerous web sites. Email: tomthemick@gmail.com

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Walker Would School Them All


I was a teacher. Still am, some say. Two comments last week from web sites on which my column runs claimed that I was educating them — and if they say so, then it’s true. What I wrote informed them about something or helped them see something in another light. For that, I’m glad. Some teachers say they're educators, but I always thought of myself as a teacher.
Was I in the education business? No, because education is not a business, not in the public schools in which I spent 34 years. If it were, it would be more effective, but it’s a union-controlled institution with the inherent inertia too many such institutions possess. Businesses have to remain competitive but government institutions do not. Neither do they have to be accountable, because they’re not elected; they’re funded by taxpayers in an indirect way. Educational institutions like public schools and colleges suffer from the same inertia objects do as observed by Isaac Newton: they have a tendency to remain at rest until acted upon by an outside force. They need to be shaken up if they’re ever going to change.
What might accomplish that? Competition, that’s what — in the form of vouchers. If parents could have a choice about where they sent their children to school, including the choice of private and religious schools, and get just half of what public schools would spend to teach a child year to year, it would revolutionize education at the elementary and secondary level.
Many are coming to believe lately that a college education has been way oversold. Parents with a child living in their basement after graduation, saddled with tens of thousands in student loan debt, and no way to pay it because he has no job, are doubting its value. So are the graduates themselves. What is a college degree worth? Depends on that the major was. If it was engineering, medicine, or one of the other hard sciences, it might be worth something. If it was in something like art history? Gender studies? They’re unproductive. There’s no market, unless it’s to teach in the gender studies or the art history department at Liberal U.
When I decided to become a teacher, I had to go back to college after I had dropped out for two years to do things that were more interesting. After I went back it took me another year and a half for a BS, then two more years for an M. Ed. Did those degrees prepare me to teach? Not really, no. For the BS (aptly named, that) I had to do six weeks of student teaching. That prepared me, but none of the education courses I took along with it did, and I took dozens. The states of Maine and Massachusetts required that I get those degrees to license me, but I’d have been better off learning more about the subjects I taught. I became a better teacher after years of doing it, not studying to do it.
Wisconsin teachers called in sick to protest Walker

As conservative Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker’s presidential poll numbers have climbed, liberal media drones have zeroed in on his having dropped out of Marquette University in his senior year to accept a job. “What?” they exclaimed. “He doesn’t have a college degree? And he’s running for president? Is he smart enough to be president?” He got elected governor in 2010. He fought off government unions, the media, and the entire Democrat political machine in a 2012 recall election, then was officially reelected in 2014 — and all that while actually governing effectively in a very liberal state.
Our media elite, however, still question his intelligence because he’s a conservative and a Christian. To them, believing in Jesus Christ is akin to believing in the tooth fairy and the Easter bunny, so he must be a moron. One asked Walker if he believed in evolution. They think anyone who professes belief in Christianity is convinced the earth was created 6000 years ago. In one week, they’ve put more effort into scrutinizing Scott Walker’s college records than they’ve put into President Obama’s over the past eight years. Why, for instance, did Obama seal his college records? What is he hiding? Liberal media elitists don’t want to know.
To be a teacher, one must first have learned, and learning should never stop during any teacher’s lifetime. There are many paths to knowledge and college is only one — probably not the best one either if Obama’s tenure as president is any guide.
At least two of our best presidents, Abraham Lincoln and Harry Truman, did not have college degrees. Neither does Bill Gates, so don’t worry about Scott Walker. If he’s elected president, he’ll do just fine, especially compared to the community organizer he will have succeeded.

Labels: , , , ,

6 Comments:

Anonymous Frostproof said...

Obama's academic records are sealed IMHO for two reasons. (1) They would show him to have been a mediocre student at best and not the smartest person in the world, as the Left has portrayed him. (2) They would show that, at every opportunity, he milked every drop from his status as a foreign student.

He parlayed mediocrity and snake-oil - and of course the color of his skin - into the presidency. Mr. Ponzi, get lost - you're not in his league.

2/19/15, 8:45 AM  
OpenID bc64a9f8-765e-11e3-8683-000bcdcb2996 said...

I'm reasonably sure I could design a "humanities" course with only
Aesop's Fables, Brothers Grimm, and maybe some Shakespeare.
I'm pretty sure I could design an Economics and Engineering intro course with only a McMaster-Carr Catalogue.
Of course, for best results, the prerequisite would be a C+ "average" in a private school education, OR an A in College Sophomore remedial (by any other name) STEM.
I couldn't actually TEACH them, I don't have the tolerance, aptitude, nor of course a license, to do so.
It was with great dismay when I was assigned to "teach" Ivy League "Masters" graduates, and State University Bachelors Graduates, how things are actually done in "real world" practice. Some were simply aghast that they had to "learn" from an uncloistered, non-PhD, "Renaissance Man" with a mere actual practical Journeyman's resume.

CaptDMO

2/19/15, 8:55 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/obamas-sealed-records/

There's nothing wrong with holding opposing viewpoints. But everyone sells themselves short when they deliberately spread misinformation. Use your strengths. Attack his character, policies, actions. But stop making up things. It just lowers the weight of your words in every sane person's eyes.

2/19/15, 8:51 PM  
OpenID bc64a9f8-765e-11e3-8683-000bcdcb2996 said...

Ooo look. An "official" looking non hyperlink!

OK, I'll bite.
"Sorry, no results."
But there's plenty of other paywall sites offered instead!
What is factcheck.org's batting average? Similar to WIKI's on controversial issues?
Perhaps there's a more reputable "source", or better MORE than ONE (that don't merely "cite" each other), to defend accusations of "making stuff up"?

CaptDMO

2/21/15, 10:11 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry Captain, the link works for me. If you're getting a paywall, I recommend downloading adblock. It's just a good life decision anyway.

This is the general gist, though:

"The idea that any Obama record is “sealed” is a falsehood, to start. The word “sealed” when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the court’s permission. Common examples of truly “sealed” documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually “sealed” in that usual sense.

In some cases, the records this screed claims are “sealed” are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly “sealed” records are normally private documents that Obama hasn’t released — and that other presidential candidates haven’t released either.

So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that aren’t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory."

Essentially, Obama's academic records are not sealed because we have no right to see them. If he decided to release them, or they got leaked (like Bush's, who also did not release his), then we could see them.

My original point being: there are plenty of things to be upset with about Obama's administration and the current state of affairs in Washington. What the political right is falling prey to right now is a wave of delegitimization in the eyes of young people due to their insistence on focusing on trivial or downright inaccurate issues. If you argue to me that Obama wasn't born here, I will likely treat everything else you say with suspicion. The fact of the matter is, he won, you lost, he's not doing the best job possible. Argue with me about *that*. It'll also likely lead to something more constructive than you putting the burden of proof on me to produce a source as to why Obama is not obligated to show you his grades for freshman year introduction to the humanities.

Captain-- and Mr. McLaughlin, too-- you both have some great perspectives that challenge my own, which is why I keep reading here. I'm just trying to tell you why so many people disrespect those legitimate opinions after reading baseless ones like Obama's educational records.

2/21/15, 2:10 PM  
Blogger Steve said...

Very well reasoned and very well written, Anonymous.

2/22/15, 8:31 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home