tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post1548179643755526620..comments2024-02-14T11:00:03.180-05:00Comments on Tom McLaughlin: More '60s Historical RevisionismTom McLaughlinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07691546351143209227noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-33725932309738507512007-07-08T11:49:00.000-04:002007-07-08T11:49:00.000-04:00In the first column on the sixties, it was my stud...In the first column on the sixties, it was my students who thought the text's depiction of hippies, called members of the "counterculture" was neutral or negative because, they said, it alluded to drug use. The above column represents my take on the paragraph.<BR/><BR/>If you don't like the first two, you're probably not going to like the third one either. Stay tuned.Tom McLaughlinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07691546351143209227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-92214787001181292642007-07-05T20:24:00.000-04:002007-07-05T20:24:00.000-04:00"Wait a minute!" Garnet exclaims as she flips back..."Wait a minute!" Garnet exclaims as she flips back to blog of week-before-last, "Inconsistancy alert! There it is...'Most thought it was negative or neutral - negative...' (the 12 sentence text-book summary of the 60s counter-culture, that is) AND YET this blog ends with 'Liberal Democrat baby boomers think all this has been terrific. History textbooks written so far seem to agree with them.'<BR/><BR/>"Negative, neutral/negative = terrific?" <BR/>?Garnethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02401188830560417180noreply@blogger.com