tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post5113087167372166759..comments2024-02-14T11:00:03.180-05:00Comments on Tom McLaughlin: We're The BestTom McLaughlinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07691546351143209227noreply@blogger.comBlogger107125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-85452462520489975052010-02-20T14:11:47.971-05:002010-02-20T14:11:47.971-05:00Fascism is here.Fascism is here.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-50974593546212856242010-02-19T13:37:42.910-05:002010-02-19T13:37:42.910-05:00That's not what you said? Then explain yourse...That's not what you said? Then explain yourself by responding to my post you avoided earlier:<br /><br />"So Dawn, you think it was wrong that those babies were slaughtered in god's name? If you think it was wrong then you put god's word in question - good for you for thinking for yourself!<br /><br />If you think god was right in ordering the slaughter of babies then you have to admit that you think the slaughtering of babies is not always wrong...because in that particualr case you think it was right. You can't have it both ways."<br /><br /><br />Which is it, Dawn. You think god was wrong or do you condone the baby killing?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-18999382703459636932010-02-19T11:27:09.675-05:002010-02-19T11:27:09.675-05:00"as alre all minds that condone the murdering..."as alre all minds that condone the murdering of babies in ANY instance."<br /><br />believe what you want, but that's NOT what I said.DAWNnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-31116820823736807512010-02-19T11:23:53.866-05:002010-02-19T11:23:53.866-05:00Thanks for the definition, Dawn, I now know that ...Thanks for the definition, Dawn, I now know that your mind is indeed seared, as alre all minds that condone the murdering of babies in ANY instance.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-55045959076526316152010-02-19T11:00:57.634-05:002010-02-19T11:00:57.634-05:00So Dawn, how does one's mind get "seared&...So Dawn, how does one's mind get "seared"?<br /><br />by supressing truth. <br /><br />A depraved mind is one that is tested and found to be useless; not functioning properly; disqualified for its intended purpose. <br /><br />A depraved mind is when the moral law of God which is written on the heart is literally stamped upon and replaced with cultural immorality. A seared mind is one where the conscience cannot function as it was intended. A seared mind is one which does not do things which are proper; is not moral and can't find its way back because their mind is so corrupt. It's when people don't think right for so long they can't find the path they should. A seared mind is one that advocates all wretched things and ignores all virtuous things.<br /><br />"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindness; they are whispers, backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; who, knowing the righteous judgment of God that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them." Romans 1:28-32<br /><br />An example of this is Clinton, the leader of our country, engaging in immorality. Even though he knew it was wrong he did it anyway even knowing the consequences. After committing immorality with Monica his approval rating actually went up. This is because the rest of the sinners felt comfortable because he's just like them. Without conscience, without reason and without restraint.DAWNnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-58387673084089825852010-02-19T08:36:44.637-05:002010-02-19T08:36:44.637-05:00Jim, ANYTIME somebody approves of murdering a baby...Jim, ANYTIME somebody approves of murdering a baby, be it in the name of god or "choice", I think their moral compass is way off.<br /><br />It blows my mind (sears it?) that religious fanatics do not agree with this.Stephennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-75807577368425523562010-02-18T20:06:43.469-05:002010-02-18T20:06:43.469-05:00Stephen, while I'm glad you disapprove of abor...Stephen, while I'm glad you disapprove of abortion, you did not answer my question. What do you think about the ‘moral compass’ people (specifically people in leadership positions in this country) that think the slaughter of unborn/partially born babies in the name of 'reproductive rights' is ok? <br /><br />Is their 'moral compass' warped?<br /><br /><br /><br />To answer your question to me: No.Jimnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-86345649266385335152010-02-18T15:21:02.765-05:002010-02-18T15:21:02.765-05:00Jim, do you also approve of the slaughtering of ba...Jim, do you also approve of the slaughtering of babies if god gives the command?Stephennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-58711629731963176832010-02-18T12:34:58.610-05:002010-02-18T12:34:58.610-05:00I do not approve of abortion.I do not approve of abortion.Stephennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-89894539991478041812010-02-18T12:01:35.251-05:002010-02-18T12:01:35.251-05:00Stephen, I have a question and statement for you…
...Stephen, I have a question and statement for you…<br /><br />Question: What is your opinion about the ‘moral compass’ of people who think the slaughter unborn/partially born babies in the name of ‘reproductive rights’ is ok? (roughly 40,000,000 in the US alone)<br /><br />Statement: I commend you for annotating your comment. It seems you are beginning to wright your own moral compass away from plagiarism and towards integrity.Jimnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-49262366419868360592010-02-18T10:55:44.776-05:002010-02-18T10:55:44.776-05:00People that think it was ok that babies were slaug...People that think it was ok that babies were slaughtered in "god's name" have a seriously warped moral compass. They have their priorities precisely backwards, they are obsessed with precisely the wrong things. Nobel laureate Steven Weinberg once said: <br /><br />“Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.”Stephen Caspernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-28401373488246174612010-02-18T08:44:38.921-05:002010-02-18T08:44:38.921-05:00So Dawn, how does one's mind get "seared&...So Dawn, how does one's mind get "seared"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-16060136081454748512010-02-18T08:44:10.914-05:002010-02-18T08:44:10.914-05:00So Dawn, you think it was wrong that those babies ...So Dawn, you think it was wrong that those babies were slaughtered in god's name? If you think it was wrong then you put god's word in question - good for you for thinking for yourself!<br /><br />If you think god was right in ordering the slaughter of babies then you have to admit that you think the slaughtering of babies is not always wrong...because in that particualr case you think it was right. You can't have it both ways.<br /><br />"God isn't going to tell me to slaughter babies"<br /><br />Who are you to say what god is going to tell you? God wanted babies slaughtered once, maybe the occasion will call for it again someday. Are you telling me this is impossible?<br /><br />Face it, you excuse the killing of those babies because it was supposedly done in "god's name" (what a sicko notion) - to me that is no better<br />then people who excuse the killing of abortion doctors, or, for that matter, Hitler excusing the slaughter of jews. You are all in the same sick boat.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-72509092732557440002010-02-17T16:42:18.918-05:002010-02-17T16:42:18.918-05:00"Do you think it possible that God could spea..."Do you think it possible that God could speak to you, Dawn? If so, what would you do if God asked you to slaughter some babies?"<br /><br />Yes, and he has. But he NEVER contradicts his word. That's a clue. <br /><br />God isn't going to tell me to slaughter babies neither has He told any individual in scripture to do so. You're talking about a specific historical battle with alot of context to it. <br /><br />We are also told to "test the spirits." Hitler was not of God. He was on the "other side."DAWNnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-61597517446318503622010-02-17T16:23:32.421-05:002010-02-17T16:23:32.421-05:00"So you saying, Dawn, that the slaughtering o..."So you saying, Dawn, that the slaughtering of babies is not always wrong."<br /><br />No. I never said that. <br /><br />You are looking at Israel's history and trying to apply that to our modern day? Slaughtering babies is wrong. We are NOT God. <br /><br />It's his divine right to do what he believes needs to be done. In this case it was for the salvation of the whole world. <br /><br /><br />He's the giver of life, not us. He takes lives everyday. We all die. That was a unique command and you're going to build a theology around that alone without taking into consideration the context? <br /><br />The OT was about the letter of the law. The NT is about the heart of the law. We are NOT under the law. We are under grace. <br /><br />"Again, Dawn - how does one get their brain "seared'?"<br /><br />I didn't say brain. I said mind.DAWNnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-2578318184917922712010-02-17T14:38:08.919-05:002010-02-17T14:38:08.919-05:00What Phil Jones really said about global warming
...What Phil Jones really said about global warming<br /><br />By Yael T. Abouhalkah, Kansas City Star Editorial Page columnist<br /><br />What did climate scientist Phil Jones say to get the global warming deniers all, well, hot and bothered?<br /><br />The Daily Mail has a story with this erroneous headline getting a lot of attention: "Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995."<br /><br />Uh, no, that's not what he said. <br /><br />Don't take my word for it -- or the Daily Mail's -- in reporting what Jones has said. He has temporarily stepped down as the director of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia.<br /><br />Read the entire interview Jones had recently with the BBC, which was the source for the Daily Mail's story.<br /><br />Here's the key part of the interview regarding warming in recent years:<br /><br />Question: "Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming?"<br /><br />Jones: "Yes, but only just. I also calculated the trend for the period 1995 to 2009. This trend (0.12C per decade) is positive, but not significant at the 95% significance level. The positive trend is quite close to the significance level. Achieving statistical significance in scientific terms is much more likely for longer periods, and much less likely for shorter periods."<br /><br />In other words, it has gotten warmer, despite what the deniers want to say.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-11287163117823208402010-02-17T14:32:46.191-05:002010-02-17T14:32:46.191-05:00Again, Dawn - how does one get their brain "s...Again, Dawn - how does one get their brain "seared'?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-11683374801815491902010-02-17T13:57:28.533-05:002010-02-17T13:57:28.533-05:00So you saying, Dawn, that the slaughtering of babi...So you saying, Dawn, that the slaughtering of babies is not always wrong.<br /><br />Do you think it possible that God could speak to you, Dawn? If so, what would you do if God asked you to slaughter some babies? <br /><br />This god of yours sure seems like a psychopath.<br /><br />That is probably why some other pyschopaths took up his work:<br /><br /> Hitler, at a Nazi Christmas celebration in 1926: "Christ was the greatest early fighter in the battle against the world enemy, the Jews ... The work that Christ started but could not finish, I -- Adolf Hitler -- will conclude." <br /><br /><br />" I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator." - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 2.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-436570196408142072010-02-17T12:45:58.628-05:002010-02-17T12:45:58.628-05:00I don't give a rat's ass about Global Warm...I don't give a rat's ass about Global Warming. I think that pollution should be limited though for all sorts of health issues.Harrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-73515143839763745972010-02-17T11:30:22.189-05:002010-02-17T11:30:22.189-05:00To Harry and Anonymous,
I grew tired of Harry'...To Harry and Anonymous,<br /><br />I grew tired of Harry's quixotic rantings against Tom and decided that a subject change was needed. Hence, my previous post.<br /><br />Also, here is another Phil Jones quote from 2/14/2010 copied verbatim, "for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming." So if we take your quote where Jones said that man is responsible for global warming and the quote he uttered 3 days ago we have this...<br /><br />Man is responsible for no statistically significant warming over the past 15 years. <br /><br />The fraudsters perpetrating Great Global Warming Hoax are admitting their 'errors' almost daily now and I'm still curious as to the level of Harry's anger about this.GBAnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-2026704971590198252010-02-17T11:14:21.695-05:002010-02-17T11:14:21.695-05:00"stop referring to an old book that most peop..."stop referring to an old book that most people do not take literally." <br /><br />The book is just as relevant today as when written. That's the most interesting part of it all. I will not stop because I know what it says and it brings peace and truth to the hearer. <br /><br />Once you've walked in a room full of light, there's no desire to go back into darkness. <br /><br />I agree that MOST don't take it literally but there are still plenty that do. The "book" itself warns that "most" will take the broad way that leads to destruction. <br /><br />"BTW, you avoided answering why god not only had to slaughter all the babies (why not adoption?) AND all the animals in the discussion from the other thread."<br /><br />Anyone who knows me knows I avoid nothing but foolishness. I thought I answered that. <br /><br />In order to understand this you have to understand the enemy who was out to destroy Israel. This is a war between good and evil. It's spiritual. <br /><br />These people were descendants of Esau (twin brother to Jacob)the babies were warring even in the womb of their mother Rebekah before they saw the light of day. <br /><br />So it's very complex but involves the protection of the Messianic line in which Jesus would be born later. Satan, was trying to corrupt it so in order to protect the line God issued this unique but divine command. <br /><br />The enemy, Satan, tried to destroy God's people right in the Garden of Eden. Later he tried to corrupt the world (leading to Noah's flood). He then tried to destroy Israel by attacking armies and then by corrupting Israel with their idolatry by intermarrying with them (can't beat them join them mentality).<br /><br />Any type of interbreeding would have been the failure of the prophecies which predicted the Messiah and the line he was to come through (Judah). <br /><br />As far as the animals, I'm not sure only that God had cursed these people and anything owned by them. In the original language it was written they were "set apart" for destruction just as his people are "set apart" (sanctified) for eternal life.DAWNnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-20843214064097812802010-02-16T18:26:54.538-05:002010-02-16T18:26:54.538-05:00Dawn, when trying to argue a point try and stick w...Dawn, when trying to argue a point try and stick with reality. In other words, stop referring to an old book that most people do not take literally. <br /><br />http://www.gallup.com/poll/27682/onethird-americans-believe-bible-literally-true.aspxAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-14334047915766138162010-02-16T18:17:57.530-05:002010-02-16T18:17:57.530-05:00Blogger Tom McLaughlin said...
To whatever a...Blogger Tom McLaughlin said...<br /><br /> To whatever anonymous wuss said Pete Seeger hasn't been a communist since 1950: Seeger said on PBS two weeks ago that he was asked during the sixties to renounce his association with communism as a pre-condition for appearing on network television, but he refused.<br /><br /> 2/15/10 7:37 AM<br /><br />Well, there's an outright lie Tom. In the biography of Pete Seeger called The Power of Song Mr. Seeger explains openly about having quit the communist party in the 50's and getting in heated discussion with friends who remained in the party. What you are referring to is his being blacklisted for 17 years by network television even after he had quit the party. It's obvious to me that you have no idea what you are talking about and further when you get backed into a wall you resort to name calling. You have no idea who I am but label me a wuss, further you find it o.k. to tell someone to kiss your ass. What kind of man are you?Tomnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-76768092313878262892010-02-16T17:56:18.465-05:002010-02-16T17:56:18.465-05:00...and if you are not too busy avoiding the last q......and if you are not too busy avoiding the last question, can you tell me how exactly a person's brain gets "seared"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20524196.post-88194311807327145742010-02-16T15:42:01.980-05:002010-02-16T15:42:01.980-05:00Your mind has been seared, Dawn. BTW, you avoided...Your mind has been seared, Dawn. BTW, you avoided answering why god not only had to slaughter all the babies (why not adoption?) AND all the animals in the discussion from the other thread.<br /><br />Hmmm.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com